Iphone

Iphone
Iphone

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Assignment 5-1

In today’s society we hear of tragedy on a daily basis, but news of last week’s catastrophic earthquake in Japan is particularly shocking. For any country to experience and overcome an event like this is mind boggling. While I am sympathetic for the citizens of Japan, I feel that the media may be misusing their outlets to capitalize on other people’s misfortune in some cases. I have been surprised to see that all media outlets are covering this. One of my favorite technology websites, Gizmodo.com, has been running a chronological timeline of the aftermath. I believe in separation of media news. I feel that if I want to find out about technology news, I should go to Gizmodo.com, and if I want to hear about world events, I should go to Cnn.com or Foxnews.com. This may sound callous, but I feel that in today’s culture we have a tendency to take advantage of other people’s suffering. Sometimes websites (not necessarily Gizmodo.com in particular) mention a popular culture topic in order to gain more hits by a search engine (Google.com, Yahoo.com, etc). I have been misled to websites in the past that are linked to on a search engine, but in actuality have no relevance to what I’m looking for. Some websites may have been set up this way in order to lure people to download viruses or spyware.

If Gizmodo.com’s motives are sincere, though, I applaud them for trying to bring attention to the far-reaching implications of this calamity. It might not be apparent at first thought, but natural disasters like this can impact the global economy. For example, major technological companies like Toshiba and Samsung, which supply most of the TV’s in the United States, are at a standstill right now due to extensive damage to their factories. Time will only tell what this will do to the television market. Supply will not be able to meet demand if these plants are out of service for an extensive period of time, resulting in skyrocketing prices for the consumer. Elevated prices could mean less demand, causing less income for Japan to use to rebuild.

Reference:

Gizmodo, the Gadget Guide. (n.d.). Gizmodo, the Gadget Guide. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://gizmodo.com/#!5780998/the-definitive-japan-crisis-timeline

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Assignment 1-3 Article Analysis

Almost every American has some memory or has heard stories of the boom of family summer vacations that occurred from the late-1940’s and continued through the 1970’s. George E. Longenecker from Vermont Technical College reviews Susan Sessions Rugh’s fascinating historical study, Are We There Yet? The Golden Age of American Family Vacations, in the Journal of Popular Culture. Dr. Rugh is a professor of History, specializing in travel, rural America, and women’s studies, at Bringham Young University. Both authors’ works really appeal to Americans that have been raised partaking in the actual family vacation experience or in the nostalgia of it. The reading is easy enough material that just about everyone has some reference to, so the reader does not need to be a history buff to enjoy it. Both works share a bit of the authors’ own experiences to create an aura of nostalgia, so the imagery may be lost a little bit on a reader that is not from America, or does not have some reference to a family vacation.

In his article, Professor Longenecker does a good job of summarizing the main points and portraying the reminiscent tone from Dr. Rugh’s book. It begins by looking a bit deeper into the tourism industry, and why Americans were so interested in travel during the post-World War II era. Longenecker quotes a key finding of Dr. Rugh’s, “that Americans justified taking a family vacation out of their commitment to the idea that travel together would strengthen family bonds and that travel provided a way to educate children as citizens’’ (Longnecker, 2009). So the feeling was that a vacation was not just taken as a relaxing way to waste time, but as a family bonding activity that would also cultivate a love of America.

While the white population was developing civic pride, though, the book detours to the grim subject of racism during this same time. As was the prevalent environment of the era, the analysis comments how racial segregation impacted tourism for African Americans. The travel experience seemed to amplify their situation. While away from a home environment where they at least had some protection, African Americans were subjected to constant reminders of inferiority and outward racial hatred.

The history of tourism also shows that baby boomers had two very different options when it came to their road trip: go west or go east? Professor Longenecker’s words help to portray Rugh’s sense of imagery, while also being concise with his wording. When speaking about the adventure of Western tourism, he states “Western stars, including Hopalong Cassidy, jumped on the westward bandwagon, but none were as successful as Walt Disney” (Longnecker, 2009). The language here already has the reader imagining the Wild West and the journeys that were partaken there. Great expanses like Yellowstone, the Grand Canyon, Disneyland, and Hollywood were waiting in the west, while the east gave an equally exciting but different adventure. With a wealth of historical landmarks and the picturesque Catskill Mountains with relaxing resorts, either direction would give a family a successful vacation.

After reading of the great American family vacation destinations of yesteryear, the next natural question seems to ask: why did the era of family road trips end? Although Rugh’s history doesn’t delve too much into this because it tries to capture a succinct snapshot of time, the reader can naturally assess the reason for the shift. The American family’s composition started to change in the seventies. As baby boomers grew up and started to have families of their own, the scenario of a traditional marriage was no longer the norm. It was now standard for women to have careers as well, so two busy work schedules did not allow for lengthy vacations anymore. Some gains were also made in the 1970’s in regards to technology. Televisions, computers, and other modes of communication have allowed us to learn about far-off sights from the comfort of our own home, rather than having to drive to all of the landmarks. Professor Longenecker accurately describes the book as “bittersweet”, perhaps because the family road travel era had to end at some point. America in the 1970’s was an entirely different entity than the post-World War II era, and the industry of tourism had to change as well.

As a whole, I found Professor George E. Longenecker’s review of Are We there Yet? The Golden Age of American Family Vacations very insightful. He was able to maintain the core points and soul of Dr. Susan Rugh’s book, to interest his readers in the topic of tourism and travel in the post-World War II era. His assessment did exactly what it set out to do, which was to make us relish the time of great family road trips, and ponder how we can resurrect that sense of pride and adventure for our families today.


References

Longenecker, G. (2009). Are We There Yet? The Golden Age of American Family Vacations. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(4), 794-796. Retrieved March 9, 2011, from the OhioLINK database

Susan Sessions Rugh. (n.d.). BYU History Department. Retrieved March 17, 2011, from http://history.byu.edu/Pages/Faculty/Rugh.aspx

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Assignment 4-1 weekly analysis

The wait is over and the iPad 2 is officially here. No more speculating what changes has decided to make. Two weeks ago I posted about the release announcement for the iPad 2 and mentioned that they were going to include the Retina display, and it appears that Apple has opted to not include this in its newest incarnation. I find this an unfortunate decision because I was really looking forward to a high definition screen on the iPad 2. Another much-anticipated feature that was left out of this version was the USB connection. The choice to not include these features may be a deal breaker for many. We probably won’t know the specific reasons for these omissions, but sometimes with technology a developer has to make compromises in their designs to release the best and most reliable product they can. We can hope that in later generations that they will be able to incorporate these features, but for now we will have to appreciate some of the other exciting components that Apple has included.

For one, Apple has supplied a beefy new processor. It is the A5 1 GHz dual core, which is an upgrade from its A4 single core processor of last year. Apple has included 512mb of memory with this version, bringing it up to standards with the iPhone 4 specs. The iPad 2 in general is much smoother and quicker than the original version of the iPad. This should make gaming and applications run much better and make for an enhanced overall experience.

With the market starting to become saturated with tablet PC’s, it would have been nice to see Apple really push the market. I believe Apple may have played it a little too safe with the iPad 2. They had a prime opportunity to push the market and encourage more growth in this sector of technology. A few cosmetic changes have been made to offer a sleeker and thinner product than the original, but I’m not sure that it is enough for me to consider purchasing the iPad 2. If you are in the market for a tablet PC you may want to consider this but from my standpoint I believe a laptop is still the way to go. A consumer can purchase a laptop or iPad 2 for as little as $600-$700 dollars, but the laptop will give you a greater range of functions you can perform, while still having a portable device. I’m excited for this technology but I don’t think it is fully realized yet. Maybe in a few more years we will have a tablet that is able to compete with a laptop or even a desktop PC, but as of right now we will have to wait and see how things progress from here.

Reference:

Topolsky, J. (2011, March 9). iPad 2 review -- Engadget. Engadget. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/09/ipad-2-review/

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Assignment 3-1

Apple has once again updated their MacBook Pro. With this update they have really raised the bar with laptops. The new laptop features Intel’s newest processor, codenamed “Sandy Bridge”. This new beefy processor enables it to keep pace with some of the more advanced desktop computers. From Apple’s last update to the MacBook Pro last year; this new processor is twice as fast as the previous generation. This time around the MacBook Pro includes an integrated Intel graphics chip and also an AMD Radeon 6750m with 1GB GDDR5. While the integrated Intel graphics chip will complete the everyday video task, when you need to handle more advanced graphics, the Radeon graphics chip will kick in to increase performance. Apple has also introduced a first in the computer industry; they included what they call Thunderbolt, which was developed by Intel. This new connection enables speeds of up to 10Gbps dual-channel interconnect. While there may not be much use for this fast of a connection yet, it will keep the MacBook Pro competitive in the future. Thunderbolt will allow lightening fast speeds to be delivered by external hard drives or the ability to connect it directly to a raid array (multiple hard drives to make one big hard drive).

Apple has really out done themselves with this latest refresh. Although not for the faint of heart at $2,199, the MacBook Pro laptop is aimed at professionals and for people that are doing advanced graphical work. Apple has really brought back the “Pro” in MacBook. Even though I would’ve liked to have seen a Blu-ray player incorporated and more than just 2 USB ports, I’m really impressed with this update and believe that Apple is heading into the right direction. Overall it is a solid laptop and only time will tell how it holds up with other PC-based computers releasing the Sandy Bridge CPU later this year. If you are looking for a laptop that is for the business-minded or professional graphics designer, this is the laptop for you.

Reference:

Patel, N. (2011, March 4). MacBook Pro review (early 2011) -- Engadget. Engadget. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/04/macbook-pro-review-early-2011/